On October 15, Nike announced that it would
increase the base wage by 25 percent for its shoe workers in Indonesia.
As the following study makes clear, this increase comes far short
of offsetting the loss of purchasing power due to the decline
of the rupiah. Even with the promised increase, Nike workers in
Indonesia still will struggle to meet their basic needs.
Executive Summary
This research is based on approximately 50
in-depth interviews with Nike workers in Indonesia about how the
present economic crisis has affected their standard of living.
While workers producing Nike shoes were low-paid before their
currency, the rupiah, began plummeting in late 1997, the dollar
value of their wages has dropped from $2.47/day in 1997 to 80
cents/day in 1998. Meanwhile, the prices of basic goods have sky-rocketed.
Workers reported that they had received a 15 percent pay raise
earlier this year, meaning that their base salary had increased
from about Rp. 175,000 per month (approximately $17) to about
Rp. 200,000 per month (approximately $20). However, they estimated
that their cost of living had gone up anywhere from 100 to 300
percent.
Many Nike workers have quit their jobs and
have chosen to return to their home villages because they can
no longer afford to live in the city. Workers who continue in
their jobs say that the wages they receive are completely consumed
by the end of the pay period. This means they cannot put aside
any money in savings or send money home to parents in the village.
Nor can they afford to buy clothes and other necessities.
In addition to the interviews with workers,
we did an exhaustive study of the cost of fulfilling the minimum
physical needs of a single worker - including food, cooking fuel,
housing, clothing, toiletries and transportation. We found that
the cost for a single male worker is $33.20/month, and $35/month
for a female worker. The base pay for Nike workers, however, is
$20/month-not enough to fulfill the basic needs for one worker,
much less a family.
This report also includes several case studies
of workers, to give a first-hand view of how they live and their
difficulties surviving under present conditions.
Both Nike workers and their supporters in
the United States are calling on the company to help its approximately
80,000 Indonesian workers in this time of economic crisis. Doubling
their wages from 10 cents to 20 cents per hour would cost the
company a mere $20 million a year. This is 1/10th what Nike spent
on its sponsorship of the Brazilian soccer team, and less than
3 percent of Nike's advertising budget. Doubling the wages of
Indonesian workers would not only allow these workers to live
decent lives, but would help convince millions of consumers that
Nike is serious about cleaning up its sweatshop image.
Background
Nike has always paid the lowest possible wages
in Indonesia, claiming year after year that it could not afford
even to pay the country's minimum wage. When Nike started producing
in Indonesia in the late 1980s, average wages were around $1.00
per day. Indonesia raised its minimum wage each year in the early
1990s, and by 1997 the minimum wage was $2.47 per day. Average
labor costs for a pair of shoes that retail at around $150 is
around $5. Nike remained the market leader throughout the decade
and company profits rose steadily. Nevertheless, each year Nike
contractors in Indonesia refused to pay minimum wage raises of
a few cents a day. Thanks to a corrupt and inefficient government,
they usually got away with it, until the workers themselves protested.
In 1993, 1994 and 1995 Nike factories throughout
Jakarta were rocked by massive strikes and demonstrations. Each
year, the government raised the minimum wage by a few cents. Each
year, the shoe manufacturers refused to pay the minimum wage raise.
Each year, days of strikes and protests finally forced managers
to agree to pay what was mandated by Indonesian law. Each year,
several Nike workers were fired for their role in organizing these
strikes to receive what was owed them under the law.
In 1997 Nike escorted former civil rights
activist Andrew Young through the Indonesian factories. The company
told Young, and he told others, that Nike factories were paying
minimum wage. In 1997, once again the Indonesian government announced
a minimum wage hike from $2.26 a day to $2.47 a day. Once again,
Nike subcontractors refused to pay this increase, despite another
year of record profits for the company. This time, 10,000 workers
went on strike to demand the raise. In response, company representative
Jim Small remarked, "Indonesia could be reaching a point
where it is pricing itself out of the market."
In late 1997, as the currency crisis began
to hit Indonesia, the Indonesian Sports Shoe Manufacturers Association
lobbied the Indonesian government to institute a wage freeze.
The shoe contractors claimed they could not afford to pay higher
wages in rupiah, despite the fact that all the company profits
are made in dollars. Worker salaries, however, had dwindled to
less than a dollar a day. Therefore, while Nike shoes continued
to sell for the same price in dollars, Nike wages in dollars shrank
drastically from $2.47 per day to as low as 50 cents per day.
In the meanwhile the cost of basic goods was rising fast. By April
1998 most Nike workers could not afford even to eat three meals
per day.
Newsweek reported that the company claimed
it could not pay workers more rupiah. "Nike . . . says it
would like to raise wages for its 60,000 workers in Indonesia
as the value of their currency plummets, but the government recently
banned wage hikes as inflationary in this time of crisis,"
the magazine reported. Nike was stretching the truth by claiming
that the government "banned" wage hikes. Nike competitor
Reebok managed to raise wages by 20 percent during this period,
but Nike continued to take a hard line, paying only the bare minimum
wage required by law.
Under intense public pressure, the Indonesian
government finally did decide to raise the minimum wage by 15
percent this year. Nike followed suit, ordering its subcontractors
to raise wages by 15 percent. This raise has provided workers
with barely enough income to prevent them from going hungry.
Conditions for Nike Workers in September
1998
This research was conducted by Indonesian
NGO activists with long-standing relationships with Nike factory
workers in Bogor and Tangerang. The research centered on approximately
50 in-depth interviews with workers in five Nike factories. Workers
at all five factories reported that they had received a 15 percent
pay raise earlier this year. This meant that their base salary
had gone up from about Rp. 175,000 per month (approximately $17)
to about Rp. 200,000 per month (approximately $20). However, they
estimated that the cost for their living expenses had gone up
anywhere from 100 to 300 percent.
Here is a summary of what some basic goods
cost last year, and what they cost today, in rupiah. The rupiah
continues to fluctuate, but roughly speaking one US dollar equals
10,000 rupiah.
Groceries Last Year / September 1998 one week's worth of rice: 15,000 / 26,000 one liter cooking oil 2000 / 5500
one kilo sugar 1200 / 3000
one piece tempe 300-600 / 1000
one bunch greens 50 / 200 (1 bunch)
one dozen eggs 800 / 1800
Roadside stall food
rice with tofu and vegetable 600 / 1200 rice with fish and vegetable 1500 / 2200 rice porridge with beans 1500 / 3000
fried rice 1000 / 1500-2000
fried noodles 450 / 900
Some daily household items
soap for bathing 500 / 1500
soap for washing clothes 800 / 2000
shampoo/bottle 4000 / 8000
Housing (rent) 25,000-50,000 / 50,000-70,000
Transportation 12,000-20,000 / 40,000
Workers were asked what they had been able
to afford with their salary last year and the year before that.
They reported that during the past couple of years they had found
their salary to be sufficient to cover the following expenses:
housing (rent), meals, and purchase of basic necessities like
soap, shampoo, clothing and shoes. In addition, many workers reported
that they had been able to save some money in a workers' cooperative,
pay children's school fees, or send some money home to their parents
in the countryside. Most workers also reported that they usually
had a little bit left over for weekend excursions.
During their one day of free time each week,
the young women workers reported that they liked to take a bus
and go to some other part of town that was different than the
hot, overcrowded slums in which they lived. Many of them liked
to go to the new luxury shopping malls that have sprung up in
Jakarta in recent years. They enjoyed strolling around in the
air-conditioned interiors of these malls and window-shopping.
This year, even that meager pleasure is denied to them. Nearly
all the workers interviewed reported that this year, they no longer
go anywhere on their day off. They can no longer afford the bus
fare.
They cannot afford many of the other items
they purchased last year. While they report that they still have
enough to buy food and to continue to pay rent, many added that
the food they ate was far less filling and nutritious than what
they used to eat. They are subsisting largely on rice, tempe (a
soybean derivative) and vegetables, and can only occasionally
afford to supplement this diet with some protein source such as
eggs, chicken or fish. Both male and female workers no longer
go to barber-shops/salons to cut their hair. They have no money
for new clothes or shoes. And they have no money for recreation,
to buy books or other reading material. Most can no longer afford
to send any money home to their parents, and some report that
their adolescent brothers and sisters have been taken out of school,
because their families can no longer afford school fees.
The researchers asked these workers whether
they had been able to afford to go home for the holidays this
year. Indonesia's population is predominantly Muslim, and the
biggest holiday of the year is Idul Fitri, the end of the fasting
month of Ramadan. All of Indonesia travels on Idul Fitri to be
with family. This year, however, many workers said they could
not afford to go home for Idul Fitri. The workers wondered whether
they would be able to go home next year, and whether they would
be able to afford any presents for their family. Every year, they
had been able to bring home money or presents for their parents
and family members. This year, however, many workers were afraid
they would have to return home empty-handed. One young worker
told the researcher sadly that she probably would not go home
this year, because she would be too embarrassed to face her family
with nothing to show for her labor.
The following is an exhaustive study of the
basic cost of living for a single person living in Jakarta as
of September 1998. It is calculated for a male worker, with the
figure for a female worker being slightly higher due to additional
needs such as bras and sanitary pads.
Need Need per month / Price per unit / Total
(Rp.)
I. FOOD
1. Rice 12.6 kg. / 2,600 / 32,760
2. Beef 0.75 kg. / 25,000 / 18,750
3. Fish 0.9 kg. / 7,000 / 6,300
4. Dried anchovies 1 kg / 18,000 / 18,000 5. Vegetables 6 kg. / 1,000 / 6,000
6. Fruit (bananas) 1 hand / 4,000 / 4,000 7. Sweet potatoes 10.8 kg / 1,800 / 19,440 8. Chile peppers 0.3 kg / 12,000 / 3,600 9. Shallots 0.8 kg / 9,000 / 7,200
10. Candle nuts 0.6 kg / 6,000 / 3,600
11. Coconut meat 1.5 kg / 6,000 / 9,000 12. Sugar 1.5 kg / 4,000 / 6,000
13. Salt 0.5 kg / 1,000 / 500
14. Tea 1 packet / 4,000 / 4,000
15. Coffee 0.3 kg. / 22,000 / 6,600
16. Soybeans 3 kg / 5,500 / 16,500
Foot total: 162,250
II. FUEL
1. Kerosene 10 liters / 500 / 5,000
2. Coconut oil 0.8 kg. / 6,000 / 4,800 Fuel total: 9,800
III. HOUSING/KITCHEN EQUIPMENT
1. rent (5 meters x 2 meters, including electricity and water) 1 month / 75,000
2. Bed 1/36th of one/ 300,000 / 8,333 3. Bamboo mat 2/12 pieces / 25,000 / 4,166
4. Pillow 1/24th of one / 4,000 / 166
5. Dish 2/12 piece / 3,750 / 625
6. Drinking glass 2/12 piece / 1,166 / 194 7. Aluminum kettle 1/24th piece / 60,000 / 2,500 8. Alum. ricepot 1/24 piece / 15,000 / 625 9. Alum. wok 1/24 piece / 7,500 / 312
10. Aluminum pot 1/24 piece / 12,500 / 520 11. Spoon and fork 2/12 pair / 2,000 / 333 Housing/kitchen equipment total: 92,774
IV. CLOTHING
1. Trousers 1/12 piece / 25,000 / 4,166 2. Short-sleeved shirt 2/12 piece / 25,000 / 4,166 3. T-shirt 2/12 piece / 20,000 / 3,333 4. Sarong 1/12 piece / 20,000 / 1,666
5. Underpants 2/12 piece / 3,000 / 500 6. Towel 1/12 piece / 15,000 / 1,250
7. Cap 1/12 piece / 15,000 / 1,250
8. Shoes 1/12 pair / 40,000 / 3,333
9. Sandals 2/12 pair / 2,500 / 416
10. Laundry detergent 4 packets / 500 / 2,000 11. Bath soap 1.5 bars / 1,500 / 2,250 Clothing total: 24,330
V. Miscellaneous (15% of the totals of I+II+II+IV): 43,373 1. Transportation
2. Recreation
3. Medicines
4. Education/reading material
5. Haircut, toothbrush, toothpaste, etc.
Total for I-V: 332,527
As the above chart indicates, the total minimum
physical requirements per month for a single male worker is 332,527Rp
($33.25US). The minimum physical requirements for female workers
are estimated at 350,000Rp/month, or $35US. The present base wage
for Nike workers of $20/month does not even fulfill the needs
of one worker, and certainly does not come close to taking care
of an entire family.
The lives of Nike workers today in Indonesia
are miserable, although this is not entirely new to them. Before
the crisis, they earned only enough to cover daily needs. When
the crisis hit, their income went down drastically. They have
a very independent spirit and do not want to ask, or are ashamed
of asking, their relatives (in the Jakarta Bogor Tangerang Bekasi
area) for help, nor do they expect financial assistance from families
at home in the village.
Here are some of their stories:
SRI MARTINI
Sri Martini lives with a friend in a room
measuring 12 by 9 feet. They split the rent, which is Rp. 65,000/month
($6.50US). For the two years she has worked, she has never sought
entertainment: she has never gone to the movie theater, shopping
malls, annual company tours, and very rarely visits her friends.
She saves more money buy buying cheap food and makes up for lack
of nutrition by buying a can of sweetened, condensed milk (Rp.
4000) once a month. She has also minimized spending on household
equipment, not buying a bed and borrowing her kitchen equipment.
She buys new clothes only once a year, for the Id Holy day. As
for cosmetics, she only uses powder and does not go to the hairdresser.
During the crisis, she has been able to continue
sending some money home to the village (she is the eldest child
in the family and feels a great obligation to help her parents
and younger siblings). But even though her consumption is minimal
(just to keep from starving), she is beginning to feel that the
costs are going beyond what she can afford. She can't continue
to live like this.
NURHAYATI
Nurhayati is a young woman who has worked
at a Nike factory for two years. The maximum wages she earned
is Rp. 350,000. She managed to earn this much only by working
overtime. Without overtime, she receives only Rp. 250,000. Nur
lives with a cousin and a friend in a rented house measuring 18
by 8 feet. The rent is Rp. 75,000 ($7.50US). The house only has
a living room, a bedroom and a kitchen. They use a common bathroom
and one toilet situated behind the house and shared with occupants
of other houses. The bathroom has no roof and no electric pump.
They have to draw water at a well to bathe and to cook. Nur has
never sent money home to her parents or to her two younger siblings
in the village. She says she cannot set aside any money to save.
She knows that her wages are not sufficient
to cover all her needs. Thus she has to make do without such things
as a bed, haircuts, reading material and recreation. With the
crisis, her consumption pattern has changed drastically. She has
begun to cut back on snacks, replacing snacks at the factory cafeteria
with breakfast at home. She no longer buys cooked food and cooks
everything at home. She only uses face-powder once a day, in the
morning to go to work, and replacing the more expensive Rinso
powder-detergent for a cheap detergent cream. She has replaced
the costlier Mustika Ratu shampoo (a domestic brand selling at
Rp. 7,000) for Sunsilk (a Unilever brand selling for Rp. 4,300).
DAHYANI
Dahyani lives with her husband, also a worker,
in a single-room house measuring 12 by 12 feet. They pay Rp. 40,000/month($4US)
for a place that is too small for two people. On either side of
them are other similar rooms, and all 24 rooms have a single electricity
source of 900 watts. In Dahyani's place there is only one lamp.
If she turns on the fan as well, the lights will go out in all
the houses. Her room has a bed, a small plastic cupboard and a
fan. In front of her house are two bathrooms with no roof to serve
all the residents of the houses. To bathe, she must draw water
from the well. Dahyani has one stove for cooking, which she does
on the terrace in front of her room. Dahyani and her husband are
very careful about spending money and live very simply. They borrowed
their kitchen equipment from their parents, and only buy clothes
when absolutely necessary (not even once a year). As for food,
they don't worry about nutrition, and eat just enough to stave
off hunger. They never go out for holidays and don't spend money
on entertainment. Even before the crisis, they felt that their
lives were difficult.
DICKI
Dicki is a young man who has worked at Nike
as a day laborer for 4 years. His rented house is poorly
equipped. All that could be seen was an electric fan belonging
to Dicki, a wall-clock, a bucket (bought together with his
room-mates), and two plastic cupboards which they share.
They sleep on worn plastic mats with pillows and thin mattresses.
Water is an extremely limited commodity. It only flows at
four 1- or 2-hour intervals a day. This makes him reluctant to
cook. Electricity is shared among 4 houses. Before the
crisis, he was able to buy jeans and t-shirts. Now he can't
do that anymore; his wages are insufficient and clothes have
become very expensive.
He wants to leave the job at the Nike factory
but has not yet found a different job. He is considering becoming
a food vendor, but he doesn't know how he is going to get the
Rp. 1,500,000 ($150US) capital he will need to start. So
far he has managed to save only Rp. 150,000 ($15US), even though
he has been careful about spending money; he doesn't spend
money on bought snacks, except for cigarettes, and he doesn't
send money to his parents in the village. As the eldest child,
he feels bad that he has not been able to send money to his four
younger siblings. He feels he needs stronger motivation to
save. Fortunately, for the last year, he and a friend have
been forcing each other to save. Every week, when he gets
paid, his friend takes Rp. 10,000($1US) to put into savings.
The savings may not be withdrawn until the Id Holy Day. In this
way he has been able to save Rp. 40,000 a month($4US).
In his four years in Tangerang, he has only
been back to the village once, that was for the Id Holy Day
during his first year of work. When he went home, he was
able to give his father, who sells shallots, Rp. 50,000($5US).
But the pride he felt in being able to give his parents money
lasted only as long as the holiday, because he soon had to
return to Tangerang, and with great shame, had to ask his
father for transportation money.
Conclusion
It is evident that the economic crisis has
undermined conditions for workers in Nike factories. Even though
Nike raised its wages 15 percent, in keeping with the Ministry
of Manpower decree earlier this year, this raise does not compensate
workers for the real drop in earnings caused by the runaway inflation
of prices of ordinary foodstuffs and other basic goods. Nike should
double wages to compensate for the tremendous increase in the
cost of basic necessities.
Doubling the wages of Nike's approximately 80,000 Indonesian factory workers, bringing their wages up from 10 cents to 20 cents/hour, would cost the company only $20 million a year. This is 1/10th what Nike spent on its sponsorship of the Brazilian soccer team (a $200 million deal), and less than 3 percent of Nike's advertising budget. Doubling the wages of Indonesian workers would not only allow these workers to live decent lives, but would help convince millions of consumers that Nike is serious about cleaning up its image as a company that profits from sweatshop labor.